After finished reading 2 different styles of director approach
from Becky and Yolanda, I can see the difference in approach each director
chose to run their program. As I compare the approaches of the two
directors, many questions have come to mind, what kind of directing style works
best in running the program? Would managing help the program to reach high
quality? Should director be more mindful about coaching and mentoring approach?
How can director keep up and balance the components of triangle framework:
coaching, mentoring and managing in order to run the program?
In the reading, director Becky seems to be using the managing
aspect. I totally understand that the quality of the program needs to be
maintained and meet most of the requirements, which Becky tried to keep up with
her teachers and that is a good thing. However, the fact that she is not
spending much time to observe the teachers and the children in the classroom
puzzles me because she did not have much opportunity to understand and see much
about the classroom environment, the teacher and the children. I surely do not
think that by meeting with the teacher and go over the plan written on a piece
of paper is good enough to help to support her as the leader. Although I think
it was very nice that Becky shared feedback and praised Juanita, she did not
give much opportunity for Juanita to share some ideas and concerns that she
had. And that was why she seemed to be struggling with the themes and
curriculums. Personally, I think Becky should give teachers time to observe
children’s interest before creating classroom themes and plans, or she could
have just give teachers the opportunity to adjust or change the themes and
curriculums that meet the children’s interest.
In contrast, Yolanda was showing a form of coaching and
mentoring. She came in and spent time to observe children interests by
documenting and doing assessment, which was very unusual to me because I
haven’t seen many director doing that part before. However, I think it was a
very good idea because the director will have more opportunity to create
classroom environments that suit the children she observed. I think Yolanda had
set the foundation of collaborative planning as she offered to find
resources and listened to what her staff may have to say and she offered
suggestions and expressed her concerns. Personally, I think Yolanda seems to
have the understanding and the components that she will best provide for program. She
takes an active role of leading, such as offering to search for resources. At
the same time, she also allows the teachers to take the lead to adjust some
curriculum plans.
In the comparison chart of goals, approaches and strategies, I
found myself in both Yolanda and Becky's shoes. I see myself more as part
of a team who work together with other teachers and the director just like
Yolanda. I find that sharing and consulting gives me a better understanding of
children and families. At the same time I also tend to follow the example
that was set in the program just like Becky.